Strategi dan Evaluasi Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif: Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Teaching and evaluation strategies greatly influence success in fostering students' creative thinking abilities. The objectives of this study are to (1) examine various literature on creative thinking; (2) examine various indicators of creative thinking skills; (3) investigate various teaching strategies to improve creative thinking skills and their evaluation instruments. The research method used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The data in the study is in the form of secondary data in the form of research journals that examine the scope of students' creative thinking. Data analysis techniques use Miles and Huberman's model, namely data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The number of articles found was 117 articles using the help of journal indexers such as Scopus, google scholar, Eric, and DOAJ. This study decided to review 36 articles based on the results of data reduction carried out from 117 articles. The conclusion of this study is that studying various proven theories and applying them in the classroom is the most appropriate step as a strategy to improve students' creative thinking skills. These strategies include active learning models such as: based learning projects, cooperative learning, problem based learning, and discovery/ based inquiry.
References
Abdullah, D. F., Kristina, D., & Sumardi. (2020). Toward Creativity And Speaking Ability Of Efl Students: A Mixed-Method Study. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 23(2), 207–219.
Chavula, C., Choi, Y., & Rieh, S. Y. (2022). Understanding creative thinking processes in searching for. CHIIR 2022 - Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505783
Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
Deak, V., & Santoso, R. (2021). Learning Strategies and Applications in Learning Achievements. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(04), 159–167.
Druckman, D., & Ebner, N. (2018). Discovery Learning in Management Education: Design and Case Analysis. Journal of Management Education, 42(3), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917720710
Eshet, Y., & Margaliot, A. (2022). Does creative thinking contribute to the academic integrity of education students? Frontiers in Psychology, 13(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925195
Faiz, A., Nugraha Permana Putra, & Nugraha, F. (2022). Memahami Makna Tes, Pengukuran (Measurement), Penilaian (Assessment), Dan Evaluasi (Evaluation) Dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal Education and Development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, 10(3), 492–495.
Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Figural or Verbal : Which One Should We Use ? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015
Kocak, O., Coban, M., Aydin, A., & Cakmak, N. (2021). The mediating role of critical thinking and cooperativity in the 21st century skills of higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100967
Kraishan, O. M., & Bajes, H. R. (2015). The Relationship between Mental Imagery, Creative Thinking and Academic Achievement of Tenth Grade Students in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(25), 155–164. www.iiste.org
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Marzuki, Cahya, E., & Wahyudin. (2020). Relationship between mathematical creative thinking ability and student’s achievement in gender perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032039
Miftha Huljannah. (2021). Pentingnya Proses Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Educator (Directory of Elementary Education Journal), 2(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.58176/edu.v2i2.157
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Meaning from Drawing Valid Data : Qualitative Toward. Educational Research, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X01300502
Mulyono, Y., Suranto, Yamtinah, S., & Sarwanto. (2023). Development of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Instruments Based on Environmental Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16337a
Nakano, T. de C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 7(February), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801
Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00906.x
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Shoval, E., Sharir, T., Arnon, M., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). The Effect of Integrating Movement into the Learning Environment of Kindergarten Children on their Academic Achievements. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0870-x
Sowden, P. T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
Stanja, J., Gritz, W., Krugel, J., Hoppe, A., & Dannemann, S. (2023). Formative assessment strategies for students’ conceptions—The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13288
Tan, J. C. L., & Chapman, A. (2016). Project-based learning for academically-able students: Hwa Chong institution in Singapore. In Project-Based Learning for Academically-Able Students: Hwa Chong Institution in Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-732-0
Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y
Tudor, L. S. (2015). The Specific of Using Educational Strategies in Teaching and Learning Psycho-pedagogical Disciplines from Preschool and Primary Pedagogy Specialization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.182
Ülger, K. (2016). The Relationship between Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills of Students. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 31(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016018493
Wegner, C., Minnaert, L., & Strehlke, F. (2021). The importance of learning strategies and how the project ‘Kolumbus-Kids’ promotes them successfully. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9393
Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., Wijnia, L., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M. J., & Van der Molen, H. T. (2018). Is problem-based learning associated with students’ motivation? A quantitative and qualitative study. Learning Environments Research, 21(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9246-9
Woods, D. M., & Chen, K.-C. (2011). Evaluation Techniques For Cooperative Learning. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v14i1.815
Yazar Soyadı, B. B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–71. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253
Zhao, X., Liu, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). The Influence of Different Learning Strategies on Pupils’ Learning Motivation: Is Augmented Reality Multimedia Learning Consistent With Traditional Text Learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810345
Chavula, C., Choi, Y., & Rieh, S. Y. (2022). Understanding creative thinking processes in searching for. CHIIR 2022 - Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505783
Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
Deak, V., & Santoso, R. (2021). Learning Strategies and Applications in Learning Achievements. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(04), 159–167.
Druckman, D., & Ebner, N. (2018). Discovery Learning in Management Education: Design and Case Analysis. Journal of Management Education, 42(3), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917720710
Eshet, Y., & Margaliot, A. (2022). Does creative thinking contribute to the academic integrity of education students? Frontiers in Psychology, 13(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925195
Faiz, A., Nugraha Permana Putra, & Nugraha, F. (2022). Memahami Makna Tes, Pengukuran (Measurement), Penilaian (Assessment), Dan Evaluasi (Evaluation) Dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal Education and Development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, 10(3), 492–495.
Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Figural or Verbal : Which One Should We Use ? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015
Kocak, O., Coban, M., Aydin, A., & Cakmak, N. (2021). The mediating role of critical thinking and cooperativity in the 21st century skills of higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100967
Kraishan, O. M., & Bajes, H. R. (2015). The Relationship between Mental Imagery, Creative Thinking and Academic Achievement of Tenth Grade Students in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(25), 155–164. www.iiste.org
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Marzuki, Cahya, E., & Wahyudin. (2020). Relationship between mathematical creative thinking ability and student’s achievement in gender perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032039
Miftha Huljannah. (2021). Pentingnya Proses Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Educator (Directory of Elementary Education Journal), 2(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.58176/edu.v2i2.157
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Meaning from Drawing Valid Data : Qualitative Toward. Educational Research, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X01300502
Mulyono, Y., Suranto, Yamtinah, S., & Sarwanto. (2023). Development of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Instruments Based on Environmental Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16337a
Nakano, T. de C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 7(February), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801
Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00906.x
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Shoval, E., Sharir, T., Arnon, M., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). The Effect of Integrating Movement into the Learning Environment of Kindergarten Children on their Academic Achievements. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0870-x
Sowden, P. T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
Stanja, J., Gritz, W., Krugel, J., Hoppe, A., & Dannemann, S. (2023). Formative assessment strategies for students’ conceptions—The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13288
Tan, J. C. L., & Chapman, A. (2016). Project-based learning for academically-able students: Hwa Chong institution in Singapore. In Project-Based Learning for Academically-Able Students: Hwa Chong Institution in Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-732-0
Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y
Tudor, L. S. (2015). The Specific of Using Educational Strategies in Teaching and Learning Psycho-pedagogical Disciplines from Preschool and Primary Pedagogy Specialization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.182
Ülger, K. (2016). The Relationship between Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills of Students. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 31(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016018493
Wegner, C., Minnaert, L., & Strehlke, F. (2021). The importance of learning strategies and how the project ‘Kolumbus-Kids’ promotes them successfully. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9393
Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., Wijnia, L., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M. J., & Van der Molen, H. T. (2018). Is problem-based learning associated with students’ motivation? A quantitative and qualitative study. Learning Environments Research, 21(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9246-9
Woods, D. M., & Chen, K.-C. (2011). Evaluation Techniques For Cooperative Learning. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v14i1.815
Yazar Soyadı, B. B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–71. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253
Zhao, X., Liu, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). The Influence of Different Learning Strategies on Pupils’ Learning Motivation: Is Augmented Reality Multimedia Learning Consistent With Traditional Text Learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810345
Published
2024-02-03
How to Cite
MARYAM, Eka et al.
Strategi dan Evaluasi Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif: Systematic Literature Review.
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ROKANIA, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 290 - 296, feb. 2024.
ISSN 2548-4141.
Available at: <https://e-jurnal.stkiprokania.ac.id/index.php/jpr/article/view/972>. Date accessed: 17 mar. 2025.
doi: https://doi.org/10.37728/jpr.v8i3.972.
Section
Articles
